A***@aol.com
2019-08-07 06:41:07 UTC
After having watched "Three Men & Adina" for the first time last night, I
was struck by how inconclusive it all was. In fact, it was so inconclusive
that my mother came away convinced that the Araber was innocent! I, on the
other had, tend to agree more with Pembleton that the Araber did do it,
but I can't say that with any real certainty.
The scene that convinced me that the Araber was probably guilty was when
the Araber zeroed in on Frank as being a "500" with such energy and
vehimence, despite the fact that Frank and Tim had been interrogating him
for something on the order of 10 hours! That whole scene showed that the
Araber was a deeply angry man capable of committing a crime as hideous as
Adena Watson's murder.
But what do the members of a.tv.HLOTS think? Did the Araber do it, or not?
--
Ian J. Ball | Want my TV episode guides or rec.arts.tv FAQ?
Grad Student, UCLA | http://members.aol.com/IJBall/WWW/IJBall.html
Innocent (of the crime) other than his thoughtswas struck by how inconclusive it all was. In fact, it was so inconclusive
that my mother came away convinced that the Araber was innocent! I, on the
other had, tend to agree more with Pembleton that the Araber did do it,
but I can't say that with any real certainty.
The scene that convinced me that the Araber was probably guilty was when
the Araber zeroed in on Frank as being a "500" with such energy and
vehimence, despite the fact that Frank and Tim had been interrogating him
for something on the order of 10 hours! That whole scene showed that the
Araber was a deeply angry man capable of committing a crime as hideous as
Adena Watson's murder.
But what do the members of a.tv.HLOTS think? Did the Araber do it, or not?
--
Ian J. Ball | Want my TV episode guides or rec.arts.tv FAQ?
Grad Student, UCLA | http://members.aol.com/IJBall/WWW/IJBall.html